Google Joins the Ranks of Corporate Ripoff of American Money

The emergence of cloud for music is promising, however far from complete. Google is obviously trying to stay a distant #2 from a music standpoint, but always letting Apple take all of the risk when trailblazing will mean they will always be sucking hind tit.

Until the American people can stand up in a class action lawsuit and fight for their right to access all paid for media, then this game of “rip off the little guy” will continue.

Thank you Google and Apple for being the conduit by which the media providers can continue to rip us off. Once content is purchased, the responsibility of the medium of which you receive it, should be provided at a minimal cost. I purchased KISS Alive on 8-track, then again on cassette, which broke 3 times, I had to repurchase the content 9 times in my life time. We should only have to purchase it once.

Mashable.com

You already know that you can upload up to 20,000 songs to Google Music for free and stream them to your +Android device. Now we’re making sure the process is just as smooth for you to retrieve your music from the cloud … Your music will still be accessible from the cloud, so you will continue to have all the benefits of cloud access. Now if your computer crashes, you’ll have a great backup for your music.

Microformats on the horizon…

Today at Searchology, Google has launched a search results enhancement called “rich snippets” that uses meta data from web pages (from microformats such as hCard, hCalendar, and RDF) to display additional details (both content and meaning) about pages in the results. This initial launch supports reviews (with sites such as Yelp) and people (with sites such as LinkedIn). They will be adding more sites and categories over time.

Reviews include the average star rating and and number of reviews for things like restaurants and products.

Google is also showcasing reviews in other ways. They’re using sentiment analysis to pull review information from pages and display that as the description below a result (even in cases where rich snippets aren’t used). This comes into play particularly with the new search options feature. You can choose to see only reviews and those descriptions based on Google’s new sentiment analysis are notated by quotes. This feature works better for some searches than others. For this search on [smx advanced], for instance, when you choose the reviews option, the fourth result is the first one that pulls a review into a snippet.

People search provides disambiguation, such as a person’s location and job title so searchers have a better sense of which result matches the person they’re looking for.

It makes sense that people search is the other topic Google has chosen to launch first, as they’ve been focusing on profiles for a while including the evolved Google Profiles and people search OneBox. In addition, Google’s internal search logs likely confirm what a PEW/Internet stuty found in late 2007: over 50% of searchers have searched for people.

Site owners have been asking for support of microformats for some time, so this should come as welcome news both for them and for searchers who will benefit from the increased set of information in the search results. Google has been testing this new results format for a while, and the reviews topic in particular has been in action for a while in Google Local [although when I talked to a search engineer after the event, he said that the technology behind revies inlocal results and rich snippets is different, although the UI looks similiar. He agreed that it may make sense in the future to find some way to integrate the two, but that’s not being done at this point.

On first glance, Google’s rich snippets appear very similar to Yahoo’s SearchMonkey. However, there are some differences, the key one being that site owners don’t have to do anything other than make the metadata available. With SearchMonkey, on the other hand, enhanced listings are based on SearchMonkey applications that outside developers build. This coincides with Google’s overall aim to algorithmically determine relevance, with little manual input from content owners required. While many site owners want to be able to provide more input, Google is dealing with the scale of the entire web and wants to build features in such a way that all content can be included, even if the content owner doesn’t know anything about Google.

The other announcements at Searchology, such as Google Squared, illustrate Google’s intent to algorithmically structure the web with little outside input.

This announcement may help SearchMonkey adoption, however, as Yahoo is encouraging use of these formats. And while Yahoo may not have enough market share to compel past the tipping point, Google may be able to spur adoption.
Read the rest of this entry »